By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Wyoming DigestWyoming Digest
  • Home
  • Education
  • Energy
  • Legislature
  • Native America
  • People
  • Places
  • Policy
  • Contact
  • Submit a News Release
Reading: Conservationists bash Bighorn Forest plan to kill sagebrush, larkspur
Share
Notification Show More
Latest News
Supporting Ukraine through Consumer Power: Creative Efforts to Revive the Economy
February 6, 2023
January 24 in Wyoming’s history: What happened on the day
January 24, 2023
Staying Informed in the Cowboy State: Wyoming’s Top 10 Most Popular News Sites
January 19, 2023
Understanding the Impact of Pharmaceutical Marketing Agencies in Wyoming’s Healthcare Industry
January 4, 2023
Unconventional Applications of Big Data: How Data is Revolutionizing Industries and Fields
January 2, 2023
Aa
Aa
Wyoming DigestWyoming Digest
  • Education
  • Energy
  • Legislature
  • Native America
  • Natural Resources
  • Opinion
  • People
  • Places
  • Policy
  • Home
  • Education
  • Energy
  • Legislature
  • Native America
  • People
  • Places
  • Policy
  • Contact
  • Submit a News Release
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Wyoming Digest > Blog > Natural Resources > Conservationists bash Bighorn Forest plan to kill sagebrush, larkspur
Natural Resources

Conservationists bash Bighorn Forest plan to kill sagebrush, larkspur

Kenneth Wolfe
Last updated: 2022/08/28 at 11:25 PM
Kenneth Wolfe Published August 28, 2022
Share
SHARE

Contents
Why it mattersWho said whatHistoryWhat next?

The Bighorn Audubon Society and Audubon Rockies have filed an objection to a Bighorn National Forest plan to kill up to 76,500 acres of mountain big sagebrush and to target and eliminate duncecap larkspur, saying the effort could harm greater sage grouse, broad-tailed hummingbirds and monarch butterflies.

Forest Service Employees for Environmental Ethics also filed an objection asking the Bighorn Forest to eliminate herbicide treatment of larkspur and aerial spraying of tebuthiuron “for any purpose,” including to kill sagebrush.

Why it matters

Administrators of the 1.1-million-acre forest proposed the actions in a 246-page draft environmental study, drawing support from stock growers along with the environmental criticism. The Forest Service would use, among other tools, tebuthiuron, which the EPA considers “moderately toxic by the oral route,” has the potential to accumulate in groundwater and is banned in Europe.

Audubon and FSEEE worry the plan to restructure vegetation across large parts of the forest west of Sheridan will harm greater sage grouse that rely exclusively on sagebrush, hummingbirds that feed on larkspur — a native plant some believe is toxic to cattle — and monarch butterflies that qualify for protection under the Endangered Species Act.

Who said what

“Sagebrush habitat is one of the most imperiled ecosystems in North America,” the Audubon groups wrote, pointing out inconsistencies in federal programs. “Through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service was appropriated $50 million — $10 million per year for the next five years — to expand work with partners to conserve the sagebrush ecosystem,” the objection letter reads.

Duncecap larkspur is an indigenous species and not invasive, regardless of how neighboring counties classify it, FSEE Executive Director Andy Stahl wrote. The plants have varying effects on cattle according to their geographic location, and in the Bighorn National Forest may not be toxic to stock, his group said.

Stahl’s group objects to aerial spraying of tebuthiuron to kill sagebrush because of the potential for the chemical to leach into groundwater. The Forest Service fails to disclose those potential impacts, FSEEE states, and its plan violates federal environmental and administrative laws.

The groups made other objections and Audubon provided an “observation report” endorsed by 12 retired land managers from federal and state agencies that criticizes the Forest Service’s grazing practices and range management. Among other things, the observers found a “lack of residual vegetation left at the end of the [livestock] grazing season” and grazing allotments that failed to meet agency standards.

History

The national forest wants 113,800 animal unit months of grazing, according to the agency’s environmental study. An AUM is the amount of forage a cow and a calf consume in a month.

Such grazing has no negative impact on the environment, the Wyoming’s Department of Agriculture suggested in earlier comments on the plan. The Wyoming Stock Growers Association wants the Forest Service to “employ all available resources” to destroy 5,100 acres — almost eight square miles — of sagebrush annually for 15 years.

Mary Flitner, whose Diamond Tail Ranches near Shell used to have significant Forest Service grazing permits, told wyomingdigest.com her industry is misunderstood. “The fact that landowners and ranchers have been dedicated stewards, who actually have a longtime watchful eye as they use USFS lands, is lost on critics,” she said in an email.

What next?

The objection process allows the Forest Service and its critics to find solutions to conflicting views before plans are adopted. “The objection process allows the public to point out potential errors or violations of law, regulation, or agency policy prior to approval and implementation of a decision,” the agency states.

The post Conservationists bash Bighorn Forest plan to kill sagebrush, larkspur appeared first on wyomingdigest.com.

You Might Also Like

Beyond doom and gloom: talking climate change with skeptics

Wyo dodges cuts in Colorado River water crisis

Kayaking calm waters

Research shows winter sage grouse protections miss key weeks

Rawlins’s municipal water failure part of a growing climate concern

Kenneth Wolfe August 28, 2022
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Previous Article Lawmakers seek to restrict secretary of state’s authority
Next Article Rails and skies
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

Supporting Ukraine through Consumer Power: Creative Efforts to Revive the Economy
People
January 24 in Wyoming’s history: What happened on the day
Native America
Staying Informed in the Cowboy State: Wyoming’s Top 10 Most Popular News Sites
Opinion
Understanding the Impact of Pharmaceutical Marketing Agencies in Wyoming’s Healthcare Industry
Opinion

You Might Also Like

Natural Resources

Beyond doom and gloom: talking climate change with skeptics

August 31, 2022
Natural Resources

Wyo dodges cuts in Colorado River water crisis

August 20, 2022
Natural Resources

Kayaking calm waters

August 12, 2022
Natural Resources

Research shows winter sage grouse protections miss key weeks

August 12, 2022
//

We influence 20 million users and is the number one business and technology news network on the planet

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

[mc4wp_form id=”55″]

© 2022 wyomingdigest.com. All Rights Reserved.

Join Us!

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..

[mc4wp_form]
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?